SUPPORT US
REPORTS
Thodoris Chondrogiannos 31 • 03 • 2021

Investigation into an incendiary device thrown by a police officer or a person under police supervision

Thodoris Chondrogiannos
Investigation into an incendiary device thrown by a police officer or a person under police supervision
31 • 03 • 2021

Evidence and data from the research group Disinfaux Collective show that in March 2021 a person who was either a police officer or under police supervision, threw an incendiary device at citizens during a demonstration in Nea Smyrni. The throwing of an incendiary device by a police officer or a person under police supervision violates the rule of law, which requires state authorities to use only legal means to protect citizens.

In March 2021, Disinfaux Collective, a research team that uses OSINT (Open Source Intelligence) tools and methodology, combining investigative journalism with audiovisual and open source data analysis, conducted a study (published by Reporters United with video and accompanying technical report), examining a Molotov cocktail thrown during a demonstration in Nea Smyrni.

By studying and comparing audiovisual material from police drone footage and eyewitness videos, Disinfaux Collective came to the following conclusions:

  • The person who throws the incendiary device “is either a police officer, or is there under their supervision”.
  • A theory floated on social media, that the person was “returning” the device, is disproved by the analysis, as there is no evidence in the footage of the protesters throwing an incendiary device towards the police in the moments leading up to the incident.
  • The device is identified as “a glass filled with flammable liquid”, of the type known as a “Molotov cocktail”.
  • Drone footage published by the police covers the moments before and after the incident, but the moment the device is thrown is missing.

It is worth noting that although the Hellenic Police has published two videos with drone footage from the day of the incident (1, 2), the footage is clearly the result of a mobile phone recording the drone footage being played on a screen, rather than the original material from the drone itself.

Analysis also shows that the published footage also does not contain the moment the incident occurred, but only the minutes before and after. The Hellenic Police have declined to answer questions posed by the investigators.

Where is the problem with the rule of law?

In a state governed by the rule of law, state and police authorities must fully comply with the law which sets out the conditions under which they operate.

However, in this case audiovisual evidence appears to show a person who “either is a police officer […] or is there under their supervision” unlawfully throwing an incendiary device at citizens who are exercising their right to assemble, i.e. their right to demonstrate.

Thodoris Chondrogiannos
More
Submit a report if you have detected a violation of the rule of law!
SIGNED REPORT VIA DEDICATED FORM ON GOVWATCH
ANONYMOUS REPORT VIA GLOBALEAKS
Support govwatch
DONATE