SUPPORT US
Thodoris Chondrogiannos
ERT: Recruitment opacity and precarious work as threats to press freedom
05 • 09 • 2024

In a statement addressed to the government-appointed ERT administration, Athens Journalists’ Union denounces the opacity of the recruitment competitions and precarious work offered by the Public Broadcasting Corporation, conditions that affect the ability of staff to provide journalistic work that is objective, pluralist and independent from government positions, as required by the freedom of the press and the constitutionally guaranteed mission of ERT.

On August 2, 2024, the Journalists’ Union of Athens Daily Newspapers (ESIEA) addressed a letter to the public broadcaster’s management regarding the lack of transparency in its recruitment practices and the precarious working conditions.

The letter notes that it has received complaints regarding the recruitment procedures of journalists at ERT’s regional stations; following the publication of job advertisements for journalists at ERT’s regional stations, colleagues, including members of the Union, who meet the criteria set out in the advertisement, submitted applications. Unfortunately, in some cases the competitions were subsequently declared inconclusive, without the candidates being informed of the result or the reasons for the rejection of their application. This dismissive attitude on the part of ERT is an insult to professional journalists and, moreover, the fact that the competitions were subsequently reopened raises questions as to why the competitions were not considered successful.

However, the aforementioned facts raise questions around whether the Public Broadcaster can serve the above principles and thus fulfil its constitutionally guaranteed purpose, because these allegedly opaque recruitment procedures and precarious working conditions constitute a potential threat to the full, free and objective production of work by its staff, which in turn constitutes a threat to the freedom of the press.

More specifically, the non-transparent recruitment rules (such as the announcement of competitions as inconclusive despite the fulfilment of the criteria by the candidates, the failure to inform applicants of the results of the competition or the reasons for the rejection of their application, as well as the practice of personal interviews with only one person by ERT) constitute a fertile ground for the more favourable treatment of applicants whom the management of the Public Broadcasting Service, who are appointed directly by the government, considers closer to the government’s positions and views.

Secondly, precarious working conditions and the possibility of easy and quick dismissal make staff vulnerable to influence by management decisions and to tailor their work to avoid being treated unfavourably by the government-selected heads of ERT. 

Where is the issue with the rule of law?

The purpose, mission and general principles of the content provided by ERT require the Public Broadcaster to produce news that respects the principles of objectivity and completeness of information, as well as pluralism and the free flow of ideas, in order to provide a public broadcasting service in accordance with Article 15 para. 2 of the Constitution and to contribute to the independent transmission of information and news, with full independence from the State, public or private authorities and political parties.

However, the reportedly non-transparent recruitment procedures and precarious working conditions at ERT raise the question of whether the Public Broadcaster can fulfil this mandate and its constitutionally enshrined purpose, as the practices described affect the ability of reporters to provide work that respects objectivity, pluralism and independence vis-à-vis the government and public authorities.

Thodoris Chondrogiannos
More
Submit a report if you have detected a violation of the rule of law!
SIGNED REPORT VIA DEDICATED FORM ON GOVWATCH
ANONYMOUS REPORT VIA GLOBALEAKS
Support govwatch
DONATE