SUPPORT US
REPORTS
Thodoris Chondrogiannos 20 • 08 • 2022

Human Rights advocates slam new governmental procedure to investigate refoulement allegations as lacking independence and credibility

Thodoris Chondrogiannos
Human Rights advocates slam new governmental procedure to investigate refoulement allegations as lacking independence and credibility
20 • 08 • 2022

In a last minute legislative amendment, the Greek government has assigned the collection and preliminary assessment of refoulement complaints to an official who is effectively supervised by the Ministry of Immigration and the government itself. The Hellenic League for Human Rights have slammed the appointment, complaining that it by definition torpedoes any hope for a credible investigation of such complaints.

On 19 July 2022, the Ministry of Immigration submitted a last minute amendment to a bill, assigning the collection and preliminary assessment of complaints of refoulement and the violations of fundamental rights during the reception of refugees to the Commissioner for the Protection of Fundamental Rights, i.e. an employee of the Ministry of Immigration itself, or a temporary employee selected by a committee composed of a majority of officials of the relevant ministries. It should be noted that these officials, in turn, are also appointed by the competent ministers. Furthermore, according to the same amendment, a committee with a similar composition is entrusted with the responsibility of monitoring the harmonisation of border management and international protection procedures with fundamental rights.

An official of the Ministry of Immigration, or an official who is essentially selected by members of the government, will therefore be responsible for collecting and evaluating complaints of refoulement and of violations of international law allegedly committed by the Greek authorities and the government. This lack of independence calls into question the credibility of the investigative procedure, as the government and the Greek authorities have full control over the process. 

We should also note that the last minute submission of legislative amendments violates the rules of good legislation. Aiming at adopting rules of good and transparent lawmaking within the framework of the rule of law, Article 74 para. 5 of the Constitution, and Articles  87, 88 and 101 of the Parliamentary Rules of Procedure stipulate that ministerial amendments to proposed bills must be tabled up to three days before the start of the debate in the plenary or the relevant parliamentary committee, prohibiting amendments unrelated to the main subject matter of the bill. 

The purpose of these rules is to allow sufficient time for the processing and scrutiny – both by Members of Parliament and by the general public – of the regulations proposed by ministers in the form of amendments. The ban on late amendments prevents the tabling – shortly before the bill is passed – of regulations that will inevitably escape the public eye, regulating in a non-transparent and unaccountable manner issues relating to individual rights, public procurement and other important matters affecting the lives of millions of citizens.

Where is the problem with the rule of law?

With a last minute legislative amendment, the Greek government has established a procedure for the collection and preliminary assessment of allegations of refoulement which does not meet the requirements of independence and credibility that should distinguish investigations into possible violations of fundamental rights.

Guarantees of independence and credibility should also be present in the examination of complaints of pushbacks by the Greek authorities, since these are prohibited by international law and, more specifically, by Article 33 of the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees.

Thodoris Chondrogiannos
More
Submit a report if you have detected a violation of the rule of law!
SIGNED REPORT VIA DEDICATED FORM ON GOVWATCH
ANONYMOUS REPORT VIA GLOBALEAKS
Support govwatch
DONATE